Posted by
NYMike on Saturday, September 05, 2009 12:00:00 AM
Its been some time since I've posted: Who can possibly keep up, digest, and then formulate a cogent response to this insane, leftist, propagandist regime we call a presidency. When the moderate right was so disenfranchised by W's losing his way at the end of his 2nd term, and to a degree rightly so, did they honestly think that this was the change that could foster a more center right approach to the role of government and offer solutions to the economic issues we face, no matter the cause? Elections have consequences.
As to the Czars. Under what authority are they granted a position and how are they paid under what budget item, and what kind of standard are they held to? Why have there been no legal challenges to these positions period, whether the appointee/Czar be serve a Rep or a Dem? Unchecked power and zero oversight to such an adviser is so Stalinist it is not even funny - except in the instance of the this current Amateur Hour we have before us - it would be a Comedy Hour ala Flip Wilson were it not so serious.
On to the Czars and one Czar Jones - R U Kidding? The welfare state has taught the black child to be dependent on government and has kept the black child in the 'hood. The Dream is still alive because the welfare state would collapse if the black child actually achieved it!! Race pimps like Sharpton, Rangel, Jackson, Obama, and now Jones perpetuate the welfare state - and have since the 50s (or he 30s and FDR to more exact) by "keeping the brother down" more than any white establishment could ever engineer. "A black child never did no Columbine" is the new standard by which the welfare state is judged to be a success?? No, 10,000 black children in the 'hood grow up to bring 10,000 mini-Columbines raining down on his own environment one victim at a time, all at the behest of dependence on government programs and the charity of others and the perpetual dream (without any possibility of realizing it) being hawked by the very leaders the black child would look up to. After 60 years of the welfare state one would think a victim of this ludicrous government cluster would get a clue - after 60 years how could the welfare state possibly still be alive and thriving if the goal of the welfare state was to eliminate what it was meant to help in the first place?